Breaking

Post Top Ad

Sallu

Monday 24 December 2018

India vs Australia: Ravindra Jadeja's 'injury' episode raises questions about team management's handling of fitness problems


On Monday, forty eight hours before the legal holiday check, Ravindra Jadeja bowled within the metric weight unit nets with none discomfort. To the oculus, he looked match. Then again, he had bowled within the nets ever since he landed in Australia and however solely on Sunday €" nearly a month when the check specialists arrived here €" was it proclaimed that Jadeja had been carrying a shoulder niggle right along.

Yes, the difficulty with the spinner cannot even be classified as a correct 'injury'. As same, he has been bowling throughout this Australian tour. He was initial argus-eyed bowling in apply before the tour game against Cricket Australia XI. 2 days later, he threw down eleven overs in their initial innings at the SCG. Since then, Jadeja has bowled within the nets at Adelaide and so at state capital in addition.

Thing is, it would not have mattered the maximum amount if Jadeja had not been named within the 13-man rate for the state capital check. Why? as a result of Virat Kohli aforesaid within the post-match conference that Jadeja may have provided the spin possibility however they merely did not take it. The skipper did not mention once €" either pre-match or post-match, nor did anyone else throughout the state capital check €" that Jadeja wasn't thought of owing to fitness problems. Kohli solely aforesaid that spin was ne'er thought of on account of match conditions when the check finished.

It makes for even additional intrigue that Jadeja was match enough to field as a substitute for a protracted amount throughout the second check. Here's the attention-grabbing issue €" he wasn't subbing for anybody player, however each 3-4 overs, he would return on the sector as a result of Asian country turned and fresh their four quick bowlers. One by one, they cooled off on the boundary, solely long enough to not hamper their possibilities of bowling now, and so stepped back in.

During his time on the sector, there have been no restrictions on Jadeja. He fielded draw in, dived around and threw the ball as quickly as he's celebrated to. He additionally fielded within the deep and threw the ball into the keeper's hands, and also the state capital boundaries weren't short ones. Point is, Jadeja was match enough to try and do that however currently bowl.

"We did not need to risk him as a result of he was solely 70-80 per cent match. If he's eighty per cent match here (in Melbourne), he will certainly play," aforesaid coach Ravi Shastri on Sunday.

His words raise a handful key queries. Firstly, was Jadeja unnoticed of the second check as a result of he was unfit or as a result of the captain solely wished to play four pacers? If the latter case is true, then is that the coach merely making an attempt to avoid wasting face as a result of distinguished former cricketers/commentators have questioned the logic of feat out a spinner in state capital. Sunil Gavaskar has slammed the team management, as has Sanjay Manjrekar, and each have asked for larger responsibility from the Indian think-tank when too several choice errors in 2018.

Second, if Jadeja wasn't match, why was he even named within the 13-man squad, particularly once there's a 3rd, absolutely match spinner obtainable within the check squad (Kuldeep Yadav)?

At times, it's a late decision €" at the time of toss or simply on the morning of match-day. Even adjusting for a late call, you've got to marvel why Jadeja was in reckoning if Shastri says they "didn't need to risk him." Was the choice to play four pacers left thus late, and was it obsessed on Jadeja pull through? Was Yadav not even within the reckoning in R Ashwin's absence €" Jadeja or noone?

If that last line is true, then it's a marvel if the skipper really wished to play a spinner. But again, that's not what he aforesaid within the post-match conference. Did the coach need to incorporate a spinner then? Or did chief selector MSK Prasad? At this juncture, it's commencing to become a merry-go-round, and appears nothing over a deflection plan of action within the build-up to the third check in Melbourne.

This is wherever the BCCI's media unharness adds additional quandary to the current heroic tale. It states that Jadeja had "shown this shoulder bother as so much back because the ODI series against archipelago at home". and so he was "given associate injection when that he went on to play a Ranji game whereby he bowled sixty four overs". This alone raises vast question marks regarding injury and fitness management in Indian cricket.

On the one hand, we've somebody like prophet Shami, WHO defied directions to bowl solely fifteen overs per Ranji innings, associated bowled twenty six overs in an innings for geographic area before boarding the flight to Australia. On the opposite hand, we've Jadeja WHO had already complained regarding shoulder discomfort and had still been cleared for additional domestic cricket, whereby he bowled a thumping variety of overs, despite a hard Australian tour lying ahead.the here were problems with Shami, WHO cut a tired figure from his exertions for geographic area within the Ranji knockout part before the tour. Then, Wriddhiman Saha got hors de combat and despite tours to European country and South Africa still unfinished, he was given permission to play the IPL wherever he additional aggravated his issues.

In England, R Ashwin appeared cryptically tired throughout the Southampton check. His injury €" another strain €" throughout the Nottingham check antecedently was contend down, with the captain, vice-captain (Ajinkya Rahane) and also the coach all claiming that he was match. Then, throughout toss-time at the Oval, Kohli proclaimed that Ashwin had been hors de combat in Southampton. it absolutely was staggering that this info had been denied once 3 individuals from the team think-tank had been asked regarding it within the varied press conferences.

This Jadeja episode appears on similar lines. That the Board had to channelise a clarification is in itself a foul try at control.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Post Top Ad

Your Ad Spot

About Blog